
After the brutal and shocking October 7th attack on Israel, the Middle East has once again erupted into conflict. In a swift and immediate response, Israel launched a military campaign in the Gaza Strip aiming to eliminate the HAMAS militants responsible for the attack. However, the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) began recklessly targeting major population centers in Gaza, leading to massive civilian casualties and sparking a humanitarian crisis. While the primary motivation behind the HAMAS attack remains unknown, many speculate that it may have been orchestrated by Iran to disrupt the growing ties between Israel and Arab states. Despite being primarily Arab, HAMAS primarily receives military support from Iran, which often uses militants in the Gaza Strip as proxies.
As the conflict in Palestine began to intensify, other Iranian proxies across the Middle East became increasingly active. In Lebanon, Hezbollah launched rocket attacks on Israeli cities, while the Houthi rebels in Yemen escalated their actions by targeting major commercial shipping routes in the Red Sea. These disruptions to the supply chain triggered a Western response, with an American-led coalition striking key targets in Yemen and deploying warships to safeguard commercial vessels. However, the situation took a more perilous turn on April 1, 2024, when an Israeli airstrike destroyed an Iranian embassy complex in Damascus. This building was hosting a meeting between Iranian Quds forces and high-ranking Palestinian militants in an attempt to coordinate operations in the region. Expecting diplomatic buildings to be off-limits, the Iranians were caught off guard and were politically forced to retaliate with an attack of their own. Fears of a potential escalation into a broader conflict grew as troops and weapons systems were placed on high alert. Despite the tensions, neither side appeared eager for full-scale war. Iran’s response—a relatively weak missile attack—was heavily telegraphed and easily intercepted, reflecting a reluctance to escalate the situation further.
While many are quick to panic, the prospect of a hot war between Israel and Iran seems very unlikely, as there is far too little incentive for conflict between the two states. To start, Iran's military is not particularly suited for direct conflict, focusing primarily on covert operations and asymmetrical warfare tactics. Iran has invested heavily in proxy forces and regional alliances, using groups like Hezbollah and other militants in Iraq and Syria to exert influence and challenge Israel indirectly. This approach allows Iran to apply pressure without risking a direct military confrontation. Furthermore, Israel's military superiority, bolstered by advanced technology and Western support, acts as a significant deterrent. Both nations understand that a hot war would likely result in devastating consequences, making it far more advantageous for Iran to continue its strategy of indirect engagement. While large-scale strikes will likely continue, there is a very low risk that these provocations will develop any further.
In many ways, the primary adversary of the Iranians in the Middle East is Saudi Arabia. The rivalry between Iran and Saudi Arabia is rooted in deep-seated religious, political, and strategic differences. Iran, a predominantly Shia Muslim nation, and Saudi Arabia, a Sunni powerhouse, have long vied for dominance in the region, each seeking to expand its influence over the Muslim world. This sectarian divide is compounded by their competing visions for the region's future—where Iran seeks to challenge the status quo and project power through revolutionary ideology and alliances with Shia groups. Saudi Arabia positions itself as the guardian of traditional monarchies and the Sunni order. Regardless, the best path forward lies in pursuing peace, as it offers the only sustainable solution for long-term stability in the Middle East. Rather than being driven by the cycles of retaliation and proxy warfare, a genuine commitment to dialogue and reconciliation could open new avenues for regional cooperation and development.